Comments on: Hey Mr. Esquire, Was That Really Necessary? http://dirtylawndry.com/2009/06/24/hey-mr-esquire-was-that-really-necessary/ Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:54:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: dirtylawndry http://dirtylawndry.com/2009/06/24/hey-mr-esquire-was-that-really-necessary/comment-page-1/#comment-315 dirtylawndry Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:49:42 +0000 http://dirtylawndry.com/?p=403#comment-315 I know the guy, but it wasn't him. You make a good point, so I'll take Mr. Esquire off the dirty list...for now. I know the guy, but it wasn’t him. You make a good point, so I’ll take Mr. Esquire off the dirty list…for now.

]]> By: Stanley Endo http://dirtylawndry.com/2009/06/24/hey-mr-esquire-was-that-really-necessary/comment-page-1/#comment-314 Stanley Endo Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:42:15 +0000 http://dirtylawndry.com/?p=403#comment-314 Did this happen to be the guy in the Wall Street Journal article last year? (Law is For Losers / Skadden_Farts?) It sounds like something he would do, and actually take pride in it. At the high school level when they're starting to consider possible majors and career options them stem from those selection, I think that clearing away some of the big misconceptions about legal job market is a good thing. If anything, it gets them thinking and doing a little bit more independent research instead of relying on what they saw on TV. Did this happen to be the guy in the Wall Street Journal article last year? (Law is For Losers / Skadden_Farts?) It sounds like something he would do, and actually take pride in it.

At the high school level when they’re starting to consider possible majors and career options them stem from those selection, I think that clearing away some of the big misconceptions about legal job market is a good thing. If anything, it gets them thinking and doing a little bit more independent research instead of relying on what they saw on TV.

]]>